You are currently viewing The Fine Print of Power: Unfair Labour Practices by Employers in India’s IT Sector.

The Fine Print of Power: Unfair Labour Practices by Employers in India’s IT Sector.


Introduction: The Invisible Walls of the IT Workplace

The Information Technology (IT) sector, despite its modern façade, is not immune to exploitative practices. While the term “unfair labour practices” often evokes images of factory floors, the reality is that the spirit and letter of Indian labour laws, particularly the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act), apply equally to employees in software companies, Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), and IT-enabled Services (ITES).

Many IT professionals, focused on deliverables and career progression, often overlook or dismiss subtle employer actions that legally constitute an Unfair Labour Practice (ULP). Recognizing these red flags is the first step toward securing your rights.

Understanding Unfair Labour Practices (ULP)

The Fifth Schedule of the ID Act, 1947, clearly lists what constitutes an Unfair Labour Practice by an employer. In the context of the modern workplace, especially in major commercial hubs like Mumbai and Pune, these practices manifest in specific ways.

1. Unjust Dismissal and Retaliation

This is the most common and severe ULP. It goes beyond simple job termination to include dismissal based on malice or improper procedure:

  • Victimization: Discharging an employee for legitimate actions like raising a complaint, reporting sexual harassment (POSH violations), or questioning illegal work directives.
  • “Colourable Exercise” of Rights: Dismissing an employee not in good faith, but under a false pretext (e.g., classifying genuine layoff as “performance-based termination” without due process).
  • Firing on False Allegations: Terminating a worker based on untrue or trumped-up allegations of misconduct, often without following the principles of Natural Justice (like not giving the employee a fair chance to defend themselves).

2. Misusing “Contract” and “Temporary” Labour

The IT industry frequently uses contractual staff, but the law prohibits employing workers on a temporary, casual, or fixed-term basis for years to deprive them of permanent status and statutory benefits (like Gratuity, Provident Fund, or job stability).

  • Prolonged Casual Employment: Continuing to re-hire employees on short-term contracts for roles that are permanent and continuous in nature.
  • Sham Contracts: Assigning work of a regular nature, previously done by permanent employees, to contract workers simply to cut down on wages and benefits.

3. Coercion, Discrimination, and Malafide Transfers

These practices aim to intimidate or punish employees who assert their collective or individual rights.

  • Discrimination: Refusing a promotion, transfer, or increment specifically because an employee has been active in union activities (yes, IT workers have the right to organize!) or collective bargaining.
  • Malafide Transfers: Transferring an employee to an inconvenient, often distant, location or demoting them as a punishment for union activity or for filing a genuine grievance.
  • Discouraging Rights: Threatening employees with demotion, dismissal, or denial of annual increments if they choose to organize or join a representative body.

4. Failure to Implement Settlements and Awards

When a dispute is resolved through conciliation, arbitration, or an order from a Labour Court or Tribunal, the settlement is legally binding.

  • Non-Compliance: An employer’s failure to implement an award, settlement, or agreement reached with a representative trade union or individual worker constitutes a direct ULP.

Your Recourse as an Employee in Mumbai

If you believe your employer has committed an Unfair Labour Practice, the law provides clear avenues for redressal:

  1. Internal Grievance: Start by formally raising the issue with your company’s internal Grievance Redressal Committee or HR. Document all communications.
  2. Labour Authorities: If the internal mechanism fails, the aggrieved employee (or their union/representative) can file a complaint with the appropriate Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal under the ID Act.
  3. Maharashtra-Specific Protection: In Mumbai, the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU & PULP Act) provides additional, comprehensive recourse, specifically empowering the Labour Court to deal with ULP complaints.
  4. Remedies: The Court, upon finding a ULP, has the power to:
    • Order Reinstatement: Place the wrongfully dismissed employee back into their job.
    • Award Back Wages: Order the employer to pay the employee’s salary for the period they were unemployed due to the illegal action.
    • Impose Penalties: Section 25U of the ID Act imposes fines and even imprisonment for repeated ULPs.

Conclusion: Uphold Your Rights

The modern IT workplace requires modern legal awareness. Do not let the promise of fast growth distract you from demanding legitimate and fair treatment. The law is clear: employers must operate with good faith, and actions rooted in victimisation or discrimination are punishable.

If you suspect an Unfair Labour Practice, consulting with legal counsel who understands the intersection of the ID Act, the MRTU & PULP Act, and the realities of the IT sector is the first step toward securing justice and professional legitimacy.


Legitimate Counsel. Strategic Results.